43% of "Domestic Violence" Imprisonments Aren't for Violence

National data reveals Australian courts imprison nearly as many people for sending texts as for actual assault.

Victoria Family Violence Funnel (2023-24)

📊
98,816Family violence incidents (Victoria 2023-24)
70%Never charged criminally
⚖️
24%Charged but not imprisoned
📱
3-4%Imprisoned for breaches (texts, proximity)
🔒
3%Imprisoned for actual violence

Key Findings

🚨
93%of incidents → NO imprisonment (yet ALL get IVOs restricting fathers)
📱
43%of imprisonments → For BREACHES not violence (sending texts)
⚖️
56%of prosecutions → Administrative violations (more than violence cases)
📈
180%increase in breach imprisonment rate (2011-2020)
97%FALSE POSITIVE RATE (only 3% imprisoned for actual violence)

The Breach Scandal

This system imprisons nearly as many people for sending texts as for actual assault.

Breach Defendants (National)
56,309
Violence Defendants (National)
43,532
Imprisoned for Breaches
6,838
(43% of all FDV imprisonments)
Imprisoned for Violence
9,050
(57% of all FDV imprisonments)
Breach Imprisonment Rate Trend
14.4% (2011)40.4% (2020)+180%

The 97% False Positive Rate

Per 100 men with IVOs, here's what actually happens:

70
Never charged
FALSE POSITIVE for "dangerous"
24
Charged not imprisoned
FALSE POSITIVE for "needs separation"
3.5
Imprisoned for breaches
FALSE POSITIVE for "violent" (just non-compliant)
3
Imprisoned for violence
TRUE POSITIVE (genuine risk)

The Three Options Strategy

In light of this 97% false positive rate, courts must be presented with three options:

Option 1: Criminal Prosecution

If allegations are serious enough to warrant separating a child from their father, they are serious enough for criminal prosecution. If the criminal justice system - with specialized prosecutors and lower evidentiary standards - declines to charge (as occurs in 70% of cases), the Court cannot accept allegations as proven.

Option 2: Proper Fact-Finding Hearing

If allegations are not criminal, they must be proven in a proper hearing with full procedural protections: cross-examination of witnesses, evidence testing under oath, and the Briginshaw standard for serious allegations. Ex parte Magistrates Court orders do not satisfy this requirement.

Option 3: Exclude Allegations Entirely

If the other party will not submit allegations to scrutiny through Option 1 or Option 2, the allegations cannot be used to determine parenting arrangements. There is no "muddy middle" where unproven allegations - from the 93% that would not warrant imprisonment - still influence the Court's determination.

Sources

  • Crime Statistics Agency Victoria (2023-24) - Family Violence Incidents
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2023-24) - FDV Defendant Statistics
  • Sentencing Council Victoria (2020) - Breach Imprisonment Trends
  • BOCSAR NSW (2024) - Remand Population Data
  • Queensland Courts Annual Report (2023-24)
  • Cambridge Crime Harm Index - Repeat Offender Concentration
Get Started - Fight Back With Facts →

Return to home